The four-year cyclicality of crypto jumps off the page. If you’re wondering why you didn’t sell at the end of 2021, you’re not alone: Hindsight is 20/20.
But rueing the past as you consider this pattern will not help. Instead, you should look to the future. Because the drivers of crypto’s cyclicality show you where to look if you want to find the next potential big bull market.
That’s the topic of this month’s Investor Letter.
What Causes Crypto’s Cycles
The most common explanation for crypto’s cyclicality is that it is driven by bitcoin’s halving cycle. Every four years, like clockwork, the amount of new bitcoin being produced falls in half. This makes bitcoin more scarce, which, the theory goes, makes the price go up.
I wish this were true.
If the bitcoin halving actually drove prices, and you could count on the four-year return pattern to persist, investing would be easy. Just wait until the end of this year, pile in, and then wait for three years before you sell. Rinse and repeat; eventually you’ll be a billionaire.
Alas, it’s not that easy.
Even if it does have an impact, the halving theory can’t explain the entirety of crypto cycles for multiple reasons:
- It’s only bitcoin. Why would the bitcoin halving influence the price of other crypto assets?
- Halvings don’t sync with big price moves. For instance, bitcoin halved in 2016, but crypto spiked one year later, in 2017. When bitcoin halved again in 2020, prices moved sharply upward. Why are the halvings sometimes aligned with price moves and sometimes not?
- It’s not big enough to explain the full cycle. For all we talk about it, halvings are not that big a deal. The 2016 halving, for instance, occurred when bitcoin was trading at $663. At the time, the annualized issuance of bitcoin fell from $436 million to $218 million (based on prices at the time). Over the next 18 months, bitcoin’s market cap rose from $11 billion to $342 billion. Can a $218 million annual reduction in supply really translate to a $331 billion increase in market cap? That’s quite a multiplier.
- It should be priced in. The timing of bitcoin halvings has been known (plus or minus a few days) since bitcoin was created. Assuming the crypto markets are even vaguely efficient, the impact should be priced in.
In addition, as a general rule, explanatory models that effectively guarantee future returns are always wrong. While halvings matter to some degree, they can’t and don’t explain the vast majority of crypto’s historical returns.
So what does?
A Radical Theory: Crypto’s Price Rises When It Creates Products People Want
I have a much simpler view of what drives crypto’s cyclicality: Prices rise when the industry discovers products people want to use.
It feels ridiculous to write that sentence because, well, duh—but for some reason, it’s never discussed.
And yet, viewed through this lens, crypto’s returns make all the sense in the world.
In 2011 and 2013, crypto’s first big up years, the product that people wanted to use was bitcoin itself.
2011 was the first year that bitcoin traded, and 2013 was the first year that the general public could broadly access it; Coinbase, for example, launched in October 2012. Prior to 2013, you had to be a computer scientist or cryptographer to meaningfully participate in the space. 2013 positioned bitcoin as a mainstream investment.
In 2017, the story was different.
Ethereum was created in 2015, offering a more flexible blockchain than bitcoin. Entrepreneurs spent years figuring out what to do with its new capabilities. In 2017, they found a killer app: the initial coin offering (ICO). It turns out you could use the Ethereum blockchain to raise money for new projects, in a manner similar to an initial public offering (IPO).
While ICOs operated in a regulatory gray area and were often of dubious quality, they were also highly popular: Investors poured more than $4.5 billion into ICOs in 2017. This sparked huge demand for Ethereum. The best way to visualize this demand is to consider the median fee a person paid to process a transaction on Ethereum. This toll—called a “gas fee”—rose from less than $0.01 at the end of 2016 to roughly $0.33 one year later, en route to nearly $2.92 by mid-January 2018.
Ethereum Gas Fees, Which Reflect Blockchain Usage, Trended Up During the ICO Cycle
Ethereum transaction fees* between January 2017 and January 2018 (USD)
|
|